Can politics adopt competition?
Now a day’s one controversy is going on in Indian leadership b/w Mr. Shashi Tharoor and Mr. S M Krishna about visa rules, I m not saying who is right or who is wrong I m looking this for another prospective. Just a movement stop this story here come to another story-
Now talk about business, how consumer get the best service? Answer is simple, that market has a huge competition in that market have a good service and this competition can be intra organization regarding performance.
Now connect both stories, because I want to link both stories in terms of social benefit and it can be the prospective of change in Indian political system. I not seen this type of controversy before, the question is, this is good or bad? The answer is simple everything have some good or bad point just look the good point, our country is democratic country everybody have a right to say, so why not Mr.Tharoor cannot speak? when Mr.Tharoor share their view on social networking site MR.Krishna says openly that if Mr.Tharoor have any different view regarding visa rules firstly they have to speak internally, so conclusion is that both are using their rights of speak but their own way and both are right, but this all controversy will be good because by that way people will aware, they will know that something wrong decision are taking and political leader will aware that, people are watching them so they will do right thing.
When two person doing the same task competition will automatically increases and decision become more simple than complex. I say whole thing not only because of controversy, I telling because by that way Indian political system will become competitive and it will develop. At last I will say that completion is always good no matter this in politics or in market overall people will get the benefit of this.